Highway Signs Update

I received a reply from the Federal Highway Administration on April 15th. Not bad for a letter I wrote on March 23rd.  For background, please see the first blog on this subject.

Their reply stated that “One study specifically investigating the legibility of sign with newer headlamp technolgy and external lighting found there are no practical differences in the ability of a person (regardless of age) to read the sign regardless of the external lighting applied.”

If that was only “One study,” then what have other studies shown? And what are “practical differences”? Are they significant or not?

They also claim that there are safety risks in that maintenance workers who service external lights are at risk. Are such workers at more or less risk than drivers who rely on the legibility of such signs  24/7 every day of the year?

Bottom line: Buraucracies can justify anything that suits its objective.


About stanleygraphics

I am a veteran graphic designer who started at the time when cut and paste meant an X-acto knife and rubber cement. I use my experience to educate others. I have an intolerance for ignorance and stupidity.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s